THE CENTRAL QUESTIONS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CICATRICIAL STRICTURE OF THE BILE DUCTS
Abstract
Aim of the study. To determine causes of recurrent strictures of bile ducts after reconstructive surgical operations and indications for precise and framework biliodigestive anasthomosis.
Material and methods. 2 groups of patients were analyzed. Group 1 (1979-1989) consisted of 179 patients, who underwent framework drainage of biliodigestive anasthomosis, group 2 (1990-2008) consisted of 215 patients with precise biliodigestive anasthomosis. Group of patients did not differ from each other according to major clinical parameters.
Results. Precise biliodigestive anasthomosis in comparison with framework biliodigestive anasthomosis is associated with less frequency of intraoperative hemorrhage (2,8 vs 5,0%), purulent cholangitis (2,8 vs 13,4%), recurrent strictures (6,4 vs 11,8%) and tendency for diminishing of mortality (2,8 vs 5,0%). No cases of haemobilia was seen in group 2, in group 1 it was detected in 4,5% patients.
Conclusion. Precise biliodigestive anasthomosis is one of the most effective and safe approaches to treatment of cicatricial stricture of the bile ducts. The indications for frame drainage is the impossibility of excising all scar tissue, the presence of pus formation in the area created by the anastomosis, liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension.
About the Authors
E. I. GalperinRussian Federation
A. Yu. Chevokin
Russian Federation
References
1. Гальперин Э.И., Дюжева Т.Г., Чевокин А.Ю. Операции при рубцовых стриктурах желчных протоков // Руководство по хирургии желчных путей. 2-е изд. / Под ред. Э.И. Гальперина, П.С. Ветшева. — М.: Видар, 2009. - С. 558.
2. Гальперин Э.И., Дюжева Т.Г., ЧевокинА.Ю. идр. Причины развития, диагностика и лечение стриктур долевых и сегментарных печеночных протоков //Хирургия. — 2005. - № 8. - С. 64-70.
3. Гальперин Э.И., Кузовлев Н.Ф., Карагюлян С.Р. Рубцовые стриктуры желчных протоков. — М.: Медицина, 1982. - 240 с.
4. Гальперин Э.И, Кузовлев Н.Ф., Чевокин А.Ю. Лечение рубцовых стриктур печеночных протоков //Анналы хирургической гепатологии. — 2000. — Т. 5, № 2. — С. 105-111.
5. Малярчук В.И., Пауткин Ю.Ф. Хирургия доброкачественных заболеваний внепеченочных желчных протоков. — М., 2002.
6. Ситенко В.М., НечаиА.М. Постхолецистэктомический синдром и повторные операции на желчных путях. — Л.: Медицина, 1972.
7. Шалимов А.А., Копчак В.М., Сердюк В.П. и др. Рубцовые стриктуры желчных протоков: наш опыт хирургического лечения //Анналы хирургической гепатологии. - 2000. - Т. 5, № 1. - С. 85-89.
8. Goetze О. Die transhepatiche Domerdrainage bei der hohen Gallengangsstenose / / Langenbecks Arch. Klin. Chlr. — 1951. - Vol. 270. - P. 97-101.
9. Hwang S. Treatment of recurrent bile duct stricture after primary reconstruction for laparoscopic cholecystectomyinduced injury// Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan.Tech.— 2 0 0 8 ,-Vol. 18. - P. 445-448.
10. Lillemoe K.D., Mellon G.B., Cameron J.L. etal. Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s// Ann. Surg. - 2000. - Vol. 232. - P. 430-441.
11. Pottakkat B. Recurrent bile duct stricture: causes and longterm results of surgical management / / J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. — 2007. — Vol. 14, N 2. - P. 171—176.
12. Pradery R.C. Twelve years experience with transhepatic intubation // Ann. Surg. - 1974. - Vol. 179, N 6. - P. 937-940.
13. SaypolG., Kurian K. Atechnique of repairof stricture of the bile duct // Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. — 1969. — Vol. 128. — P. 1071-1076.
14. Smith R. Strictures of the bile duct / / Proc. R. Soc. Med. — 1969. - Vol. 62. - P. 131-137.