Sechenov Medical Journal

Advanced search


Full Text:


We registered nasal cycles and the mucociliary transport time in 40 adults: 20 men (18-71) and 20 women (18-70) with acute rhinosinusitis. Subjects had no signs of other systems’ pathologies, bad habits and other ENT organs’ diseases. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups of 20 people each (10 men, 10 women). Patients of the group 1received intranasal topical decongestant (a spray of 0.1 % xylometazoline solution), patients of the group 2 received intranasal glucocorticosteroid (mometasone furoate spray). Every subject was tested with rhinoflowmeter «Rhinocycle» for 16-18 hours excluding the night sleep period. The mucociliary transport time was recorded before the study and 1 hour after the intranasal spray administration. The graphs of relative airflow volume’s fluctuations were made.We found that airflow fluctuations were predominantly irregular before the intranasal spray administration in both groups. The relative volumetric flow increased significantly in both groups after topical sprays administration. It was higher in the group 1than that in the group 2, however, the difference was statistically insignificant (p 0.05). The average duration of nasal cycle’s fluctuations in patients of the group 1 increased, in the subjects of the group 2, on the contrary, it decreased (p 0.05). Besides, topical decongestants administration significantly improved nasal breathing, but adversely affected the ciliated epithelium’s transport function and airflow fluctuations’ orderly cyclicity. In contrast, the glucocorticosteroid administration decreased the mucociliary transport time and contributed

About the Authors

V. Shilenkova
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Russian Federation

O. V. Fedoseeva
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Russian Federation


1. Ohki M., Ogoshi T., Yuasa T. et al. Extended observation of the nasal cycle using a portable rhinoflowmeter // Journal of Otolaryngology. 2005; 34(5): 346-349.

2. Козлов В.С., Державина Л.Л., Шиленкова В.В. Возможности акустической ринометрии и передней активной риноманометрии в изучении носового цикла // Российская ринология. 2002; 1: 4-10.

3. White D.E., Bartley J., Nates R.J. Model demonstrates functional purpose of the nasal cycle // Bio Medical Engineering On Line. 2015; 24(14): 38.

4. Пискунов Г.З., Пискунов С.З. Свободу носовому дыханию // Российская ринология. 2010; 4: 34-45.

5. Державина Л.Л. Морфофизиологические особенности полости носа в норме и при ее функциональных нарушениях по данным методов передней активной риноманометрии и акустической ринометрии: автореф. дисс. … канд. биол. наук: 03.00.13. Ярославль; 2002: 26.

6. Шиленкова В.В. Острые и рецидивирующие синуситы у детей (диагностика и лечение): автореф. дисс. … докт. мед. наук: 14.00.04. М.; 2008: 42.

7. Савватеева Д.М., Свистушкин В.М. Современные тенденции в лечении пациентов с острым риносинуситом // Русский медицинский журнал. Оториноларингология. 2016; 4: 251-254.

8. Kirtsreesakul V., Hararuk K., Leelapong J. et al. Clinical efficacy of nasal steroids on nonallergic rhinitis and the associated inflammatory cell phenotypes // American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy. 2015; 29(5): 343-349. Braun T., Rich M., Berghaus A. et al. Effects of oxymetazoline nasal spray on the nasal cycle assessed by long term rhinoflowmetry. Rhinology. 2012; 50(4): 370-375.

9. Bercin S., Ural A., Kutluhan A. Effects of topical drops and sprays on mucociliary transport time and nasal air flow // Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2009; 129(11): 1257-1261.

10. Grutzenmacher S., Lang C., Mlynski R. et al. Long term rhinoflowmetry: a new method for functional rhinologic diagnostics // American Journal of Rhinology. 2005; 19(1): 53-57.

11. Пискунов С.З., Пискунов Г.З., Разиньков С.П. Методика исследования функционального состояния слизистой оболочки полости носа: Методические рекомендации. - М. 1983


Views: 301

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2218-7332 (Print)
ISSN 2658-3348 (Online)