Preview

Sechenov Medical Journal

Advanced search

ROLE OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSISIN EVALUATION OF PREGRAVID ENDOMETRIUM IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION PROGRAM

Full Text:

Abstract

Uterine disorders can considerably contribute to infertility. In order to overcome many different causes of female infertility a complex of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures was established. More than 100 bioactive substances influence the process of nidation. Uteroplacental relations are key factor of onset and normal course of pregnancy. The aim of current research is to evaluate prognostic value of expression of steroid hormone receptors and Ki-67 protein in pregravid endometrium of patients with positive results of in-vitro fertilization program. Research included 167 patients who underwent IVF and embryo transfer program in Base Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Krasnodar, in 2016-2017 years. Two groups were formed as follows: the 1st group was made of 72 patients who had pregnancy after IVF program and had full term delivery; the 2nd group was composed of 95 women with the negative result after IVF program. All patients had been examined according to the Ministry of Healthcare Order№ 107n “On applying assisted reproductive technologies, contraindications and limitations of their use” and had their first IVF program. The endometrial biopsy was performed on day 8-11 of menstrual period in order to conduct histological and immunohistochimical analyses. IHC showed irregular expression of steroid hormone receptors in endometrial glands and stroma and altered proliferative activity of those structures in women with unsuccessful IVF. Assessment of steroid hormone receptors expression and protein Ki-67 expression may be considered as additional prognostic criteria of success in IVF. Immunohistochemical analysis of pregravid endometrium can improve diagnosis of uterine causes of infertility.

About the Authors

V. A. Krutova
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Professional Education «Kuban State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


Ya. A. Kovalenko
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Professional Education «Kuban State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


L. M. Chuprinenko
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Professional Education «Kuban State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


A. A. Ordokova
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Professional Education «Kuban State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


O. V. Tarabanova
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Professional Education «Kuban State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


References

1. Вартанян Э.В., Мартышкина Е.Ю., Цатурова К.А. Роль сочетанной патологии в неудачных протоколах ЭКО. Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция. 2011; 4: 40-44.

2. Овчарук Э.А. Хронический аутоимунный эндометрит как одна из главных причин нарушения репродуктивной функции: обзор литературы. Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2013; 1.

3. Крутова В.А., Ермошенко Б.Г. Причины женского бесплодия: обзор литературы. Успехи современного естествознания. 2005; 11: 16-19.

4. Крутова В. А. Социально-психологические и медицинские аспекты лечения женского бесплодия. Дисс. На соискание ученой степени канд. мед. наук. Архангельск. 2006; 150 с.

5. Шнейдерман М.Г., Аполихина И.А., Калинина Е.А., Абубакиров А.Н. и др. Новое об имплантации эмбриона в эндометрий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2013; 11: 75-78.

6. Edgell T.A., Rombauts L.J., Salamonsen L.A. Assessing receptivity in the endometrium: the need for a rapid, non-invasive test. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2013; 27(5): 486-496.

7. Fatemi H.M., Popovic-Todorovic B. Implantation in assisted reproduction: a look at endometrial receptivity. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2013; 27(5): 530-538.

8. Кравчук Я.Н., Калугина А.С. Оценка рецептивности эндометрия с помощью биомаркеров: обзор. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2012; 6: 61-67.

9. Amyan T.S., Perminova S.G., Krechetova L.V., Vtorushina V.V., Mityrina E.V. Repeated implantation failures in an IVF program: immunological aspects. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2017; 1: 5-12.

10. Крутова А.В., Асланян И.Э., Чулкова А.М., Авагимова О.В. и соавт. Немедикаментозная коррекция гормонального фона и психовегетативного статуса у женщин с патологией репродуктивной системы в здравницах Краснодарского края. Вопросы курортологии, физиотерапии и лечебной физической культуры. 2011; 6: 28-33.

11. Колмык В.А., Насыров Р.А., Кутушева Г.Ф. Клинико-иммуногистохимические аспекты восстановления репродуктивной функции женщин с хроническим эндометритом. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2014; 4: 34-38.

12. Коган Е.А., Демура Т.А., Водяной В.Я., Шуршалина А.В. Молекулярные и морфологические аспекты нарушений рецептивности эндометрия при хроническом эндометрите. Архив патологии. 2012; 3: 15-17.

13. Бессмертная В.С., Самойлов М.В. Рецепторы к эстрогенам и прогестерону в эндометрии женщин при бесплодии. Вестник РУДН. 2007; 2: 48-51.

14. Казачкова Э.А., Хелашвили И.Г., Казачков Е.Л., Воропаева Е.Е. и соавт. Хронический эндометрит: клинико-морфологическая характеристика и особенности рецептивности эндометрия. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2014; 4: 47-52.

15. Rai P. et al. Proteome of human endometrium: identification of differentially expressed proteins in proliferative and secretory phase endometrium. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2010; 4(1): 48-59.


Review

Views: 177


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2218-7332 (Print)
ISSN 2658-3348 (Online)