Preview

Sechenov Medical Journal

Advanced search

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT SUPPORTED REHABILITATION OF EDENTULOUS LOWER JAW WITH PERMANENT PROSTHESIS FIXED ON LESSER AMOUNTOF IMPLANTS. MULTICENTERED CLINICAL TRIAL

Full Text:

Abstract

The aim of our study is to perform a comprehensive evaluation of our experience of immediate implant supported prosthetic treatment utilising new method TREFOIL indicated in cases of severe atrophy of the lower jaw. 3D planning of the implant supported rehabilitation based on clinical data and X-Ray examination (on CBCT evaluation) was performed in Nobel Clinician software with subsequent immediate placement of 3 implants on lower jaw and concurrent delivery of the final prosthesis with standard titanium framework. We applied specially designed Compensation Mechanism to ensure passive fit to the implants. We made time study of the clinical and laboratory stages of treatment, analysed short and long term results of patients rehabilitation. For this concept we used specially designed Nobel Biocare implants with parallel walls and conical connection with the following parameters: diameter - 5.0 mm, length - 11.5/13.0 mm + 4.5 mm. We gained average initial stability torque 38.8 N/cm (from 32 to 47 N/cm) which is sufficient enough for performing immediate loading protocol. Implant and implant supported prosthesis survival rate is 100 %. Average total treatment time is 6.3 hour.

About the Authors

R. A. Rozov
St. Petersburg State Budgetary Health Care Institution «City Dental Clinic No. 33»
Russian Federation


V. N. Trezubov
I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation


G. S. Azarin
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Novgorod State University named after Yaroslav the Wise»
Russian Federation


References

1. Ahuja S., Cagna D.R. Classification and management of restorative space in edentulous implant overdenture patients. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2011; 105(5): 332-337.

2. Brånemark P.I., Engstrand P., Ohrnell L.O., Gröndahl K. et al. Brånemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 1999; 1(1): 2-16.

3. Chow J., Hui E., Liu J., Li D. et al. The Hong Kong Bridge Protocol. Immediate loading of mandibular Brånemark fixtures using a fixed provisional prosthesis: preliminary results. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2001; 3(3): 166-174.

4. De Bruyn H., Kisch J., Collaert B., Lindén U. et al. Fixed mandibular restorations on three early-loaded regular platform Brånemark implants. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2001; 3(4): 176-184.

5. Engstrand P., Gröndahl K., Ohrnell L.O., Nilsson P. et al. Prospective follow-up study of 95 patients with edentulous mandibles treated according to the Brånemark Novum concept. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2003; 5(1): 3-10.

6. Friberg B., Jemt T. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2008; 10(1): 47-54.

7. Greenstein G., Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J. Periodontol. 2006; 77(12): 1933- 1943.

8. Gualini F., Gualini G., Cominelli R., Lekholm U. Outcome of Brånemark Novum implant treatment in edentulous mandibles: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2009; 11(4): 330-337.

9. Henry P.J., van Steenberghe D., Blombäck U., Polizzi G. et al. Prospective multicenter study on immediate rehabilitation of edentulous lower jaws according to the Brånemark Novum protocol. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2003; 5(3): 137-142.

10. Lin C.S., Wu S.Y., Huang H.Y., Lai Y.L. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Incidence of Altered Sensation of Mandibular Implant Surgery. PLoS One. 2016; 11(4): e0154082.

11. Mraiwa N., Jacobs R., van Steenberghe D., Quirynen M. Clinical assessment and surgical implications of anatomic challenges in the anterior mandible. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2003; 5(4): 219-225.

12. Papaspyridakos P., Chen C.J., Chuang S.K., Weber H.P. Implant loading protocols for edentulous patients with fixed prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl.: 256-270.

13. Pigadas N., Simoes P., Tuffin J.R. Massive sublingual haematoma following osseo-integrated implant placement in the anterior mandible. Br. Dent. J. 2009; 206(2): 67-68.

14. Trulsson U., Engstrand P., Berggren U., Nannmark U. et al. Edentulousness and oral rehabilitation: experiences from the patientsʼ perspective. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2002; 110(6): 417- 424.

15. Трезубов В.Н., Розов Р.А., Азарин Г.С. Концептуальный подход к классификации протяженных имплантационных замещающих конструкций, использующихся у пациентов с полной потерей зубов. Стоматология. 2017; 96(1): 51-55.


Review

Views: 175


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2218-7332 (Print)
ISSN 2658-3348 (Online)