HISTORY AND TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY TESTING
摘要
The present article discusses a history and technological aspects of antibiotic susceptibility testing methods and indentifies individual periods associated with the introduction of new technologies. The article demonstrates that the introduction of a diagnostic approach is associated with technological elaboration, standardization, the availability of appropriate equipment, qualified personnel, organizational structure and the international recognition, as well as medical and economic efficiency. “Noncultural” automated technologies seem to be promising for practical implementation. Meanwhile, the progressin this field requires serious consideration of a number of technological and organizational issues, e.g. standardization and the proof of specificity.
关于作者
V. Zverev
First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University; Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution I. Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯联邦
Yu. Nesvizhskiy
First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯联邦
S. Mindlin
First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯联邦
N. Tarasova
First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯联邦
参考
1. Philip F. Wheat. History and development of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methodology // J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001; 48 (suppl 1): 1-4.
2. Roberts W. Studies on biogenesis // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1874; 164: 466.
3. Fleming A. A comparison of the activities of antiseptics on bacteria and on leucocytes // Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 1924; Series B 96: 171-180.
4. Fleming A. On the antibacterial action of cultures of a penicillium, with special reference to their use in the isolation of B. influenza // British Journal of Experimental Pathology. 1929; 10: 226-236.
5. Ермольева З.В. Пенициллин. М. Медгиз. 1946. 158 с.
6. Reddish G.F. Methods of testing antiseptics // Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. 1929; 14: 649-658.
7. Abraham E.P., Chain E., Fletcher C.M. et al. Further observations on penicillin // Lancet ii. 1941; 177-188.
8. Heatley N.G. Method for the assay of penicillin // Biochemical Journal. 1944; 38: 61-65.
9. Vincent J.G., Vincent H.W. Filter paper disc modification of the Oxford cup penicillin determination // Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. 1944; 55: 162-164.
10. Bondi A., Spaulding E.H., Smith D.E., Dietz C.C. Routine method for rapid July 2001 4 determination of susceptibility to penicillin and other antibiotics // American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 1947; 213: 221-225.
11. Hoyt R.E., Levine M.G. Method for determining sensitivity to penicillin and streptomycin // Science. 1947; 106: 171.
12. Mohs F.E. A simple quantitative test for the penicillin sensitivity of bacteria: the «radial streak» method // Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. 1945; 30: 800-802.
13. Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. A guide to sensitivity testing // Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1991; 27 Suppl. D: 1-50.
14. Fleming A. In-vitro tests of penicillin potency // Lancet i. 1942; 732-733.
15. Гаузе Г.Ф. Грамицидин С и его применение. М. Медгиз. 1952. 153 с. [Gause, F. G. Gramicidin s and its use. M. Medgiz. 1952. 153 c.
16. Schmith K., Reymann F.E. Expeimentelle og kliniske undersogelser over gonococcers folsomhed overfor sulfapyridin // Nordisk Medicin. 1940; 8: 2493-2499.
17. Frisk A.R. Bestamning av penicillin koncentration och penicillinkaslighet // Nordisk Medicin. 1945; 28: 22492252.
18. Jackson G.G., Finland M. Comparison of methods for determining sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics in vitro // Archives of Internal Medicine. 1951; 88: 446-460.
19. Garrett S.D. A multiple – point inoculating needle for agar plates // Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 1946; 29: 171-172.
20. Steers E., Foltz E.L., Graves B.S. An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics // Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 1959; 9: 307-311.
21. Hutchison J.G.P. Antibiotic sensitivity tests: a rapid method suitable for multiple cultures // Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1954; 7: 350-351.
22. Tolhurst J.C., Buckle G., Williams S.W. Agar dilution tests. In Chemotherapy with Antibiotics and Allied Drugs. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Canberra. 1963; 2nd edn.: pp. 153-154.
23. Spencer R.C., Wheat P.F. Novel mechanisms for determining antibiotic susceptibilities // Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1986; 17: 404-407.
24. Mckie J., Borovoy R., Dooley J., Enavega G. et al. Autobac I – A three hour automated antimicrobial susceptibility system. In Automation in Microbiology and Immunology, (Heden C., Illeni T., Eds). NY. John Wiley. 1974. 187-189.
25. Spencer H.J., Stockert J., Welaj P. et al. Automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the MS-2 system. In Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology. (Johnston, H.H., Newsom S.W.B.). NY. John Wiley. 1977. 262-263.
26. Aldridge C., Jones P.W., Gibbson S. et al. Automated microbiological detection/identification system // Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1977; 6: 406-413.
27. Медицинская технология «Применение экспресс-метода лазерной флуоресценции для определения чувствительности микроорганизмов к антимикробным препаратам» от 07.08.2007 г. (№ ФС-2007/158).
28. A. van Belkum, W.M. Dunne Jr. Next-Generation Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. // J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013; 51(7): 2018.
29. Gfeller K.Y., Nugaeva N., Hegner M. Rapid biosensor for detection of antibiotic-selective growth of Escherichia coli. // Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005; 71: 2626-2631.
30. Bergeron M.G., Ouellette M. Preventing antibiotic resistance through rapid genotypic identification of bacteria and of their antibiotic resistance genes in the clinical microbiology laboratory. // Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1998; 36: 2169-2172.
31. Courvalin P. Genotypic approach to the study of bacterial resistance to antibiotics. // Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1991; 35: 1019-1023.
32. Tenover F.C. Bauer and Kirby meet Watson and Crick: antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the molecular era. // ASM News. 1992; 58: 669-672.
33. Arlet G., Philippon A. PCR-based approaches for the detection of bacterial resistance. In PCR-based Diagnostics in Infectious Diseases, (Ehrlich G.D., Greenberg S. J. Eds), Oxford. Blackwell Scientific Publications. 1994. 665-687.
34. Семенихина А.В., Рахманова Т.И., Нехаева Г.И., Попова Т.Н. Учебно-методическое пособие для вузов. Воронеж. Издательско-полиграфический центр Воронежского государственного университета. 2007. 69 с.
35. Snell J.J.S., Danvers M.V.S., Gardner P.S. Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab and disc methods. // Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1984; 37: 1059-1065.
36. Heatley N.G. Methods for measuring the sensitivity of micro-organisms to antibiotics. In Antibiotics, Volume 1. (Florey H.W., Chain E., Heatley N.G. et al., Eds). London. Oxford University Press. 1949. pp. 200-214.
37. Erlanson P. Determination of the sensitivity in vitro of bacteria to chemotherapeutic agents with special reference to routine tests. // Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica Suppl. 1951; 85: 1-162.
38. Waterworth P.M. A comparative study of methods of testing sensitivity to antibiotics and of the factors influencing the results. // Journal of Medical Laboratory Technology. 1951; 9: 65-85.
39. Gould J.C., Bowie J.H. The determination of bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics. // Edinburgh Medical Journal. 1952; 59: 178-199.
40. Ericsson H., Sherris J.C. Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study. // Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B, Suppl. 1971; 217: 1-90.
41. World Health Organisation. Standardization of Methods for Conducting Microbic Sensitivity Tests. Second report of the Expert Committee on Antibiotics. WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva. WHO. 1961. № 210.
42. Bauer A.W., Kirby W.M.M., Sherris J.C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. // American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1966. 45: 493-496.
43. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard M2-A7 ASM-2. Villanova. PA. NCCLS. 1975.
44. Алексеев В.В. и др. Медицинские лабораторные технологии. Руководство по клинической лабораторной диагностике. В 2 томах. Том 1 / под ред. А.И. Карпищенко. 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва. ГЭОТАРМедиа. 2012. 472 с.
评论
浏览:
340
Email this article 