Providing specialized care for children with congenital cleft lip and palate
Abstract
The results of medical studies have enhanced the understanding of the common and individual characteristics of children suffering with congenital cleft lip and palate, and alveolar process. They serve as a justification for the extension of the initial surgery, reducing the time and stages of rehabilitation to get persistent anatomical, functional and aesthetic results. Medical as well physical, psychological, and in some cases social rehabilitation can be achieved in some cases by the start of schooling. In this case, the children go to regular public schools. Scientific and practical results achieved over the past decade, confirm the urgent need for significant changes in the delivery of complex specialized medical care. In the future powerful scientific and rehabilitation centers, staffed with professionals qualified in the application of modern technology will be provided to all who need a comprehensive system of therapeutic intervention. The success of health care in general and, specifically, integrated health and social care for children with congenital disorders, depends on the collective and concerted efforts of the government alongside health care professionals at all levels. It is also vital to make the public aware that such care is available to patients.
About the Authors
A. A. Mamedov
The First MSMU named after I.M. Sechenov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, prof., head of the chair of pediatric dentistry and orthodontics
O. I. Admakin
The First MSMU named after I.M. Sechenov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, prof. of the chair of pediatric dentistry and orthodontics, dean of the Faculty of Dentistry
O. V. Nelyubina
The First MSMU named after I.M. Sechenov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, assistant of the chair of pediatric dentistry and orthodontics
A. B. Selitskaya
The First MSMU named after I.M. Sechenov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
assistant of the chair of pediatric dentistry and orthodontics
Zh. A. Blinder
The First MSMU named after I.M. Sechenov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
assistant of the chair of pediatric dentistry and orthodontics
References
1. Блохина С.И., Козлова В.П. Детские реабилитационные центры нового типа в России — сегодня и завтра // Очерки медико-социальной реабилитации семей, имеющих детей с проблемами здоровья; часть III, актуальные вопросы социально-педагогической и медицинской реабилитации детей. Материалы научнопрактического семинара в г. Златоусте, 8–11 августа 1995. — Екатеринбург, 1995. — С. 3–9.
2. Козин И.А. Эстетическая хирургия врожденных расщелин лица. — М., 1996. — 563 с.
3. Мамедов Ад.А. Врожденная расщелина неба и пути ее устранения. — Екатеринбург, 2012. — 309 с.
4. Дмитриева В.С., Ландо Р.Л. Хирургическое лечение врожденных и послеоперационных дефектов неба. — М., 1968. — 120 с.
5. Семенченко Г.И., Вакуленко В.И., Лукьяненко В.А. и др. Хирургические способы восстановления небно-глоточного смыкания после неудачных исходов уранопластики // Стоматология. — 1986. — № 3. — С. 51–52.
6. Bardach J., Salyer K.E. Cleft palate repair // Surgical techniques in cleft lip and palate. 2nd ed. — St. Louis: «MosbyYearbook», 1991.
7. Muntz H.R. An overview of middle ear disease in cleft palate children // J. Facial Plastic Surgery. — 1993. — Vol. 9. — № 3. — P. 177–180.
8. Dunn D.C. Audit of surgical fi rm by microcomputer: fi ve years experience // Br. Med. F. — 1988. — Vol. 296. — № 6623. — P. 687–691.
9. Morris H.L.: A comparative study of results of the Von Langenbeck and V-Y pushback palatoplasties // Cleft Palate J. — 1976. — Vol. 13. — P. 11–l9.
10. Peterson-Fabone S.J. A cross-sectional analysis of speech results following palatal closure // Bardach J., Morris H. Multidisciplinary management of cleft lip and palate. — Philadelphia: «WB Saunders», 1990. — P. 750–757.
11. Ермакова И.И. Коррекция речи и голоса у детей и подростков. — М., Просвещение, АО «Учебная литература», 1996. — 144 с.
12. Brown A.S., Cohen M.M., Randall P. Levator muscle reconstruction: does it make a diff erence? // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. — 1983. — Vol. 72. — P. 1–6.
13. Randall P., LaRosa D., Fakhraee S.M. et al. Cleft palate closure at three to nine months of age: A preliminary report // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. — 1983. — Vol. 71. — P. 624.
14. Tatum S., Senders C. Perspectives on palatoplasty // Facial Plastic Surgery. — 1993. — Vol. 9. — № 3. — P. 225–231.
15. Cook J. Pirrucello F.W. The team concept and cleft management // Cleft lip and palate. Plastic surgery, genetics and the team approach. — Springfi eld, IL, Charles C. Thomas, 1987. — P. 3.
16. Halve L.M. An ideal cleft palate-craniofacial team for comprehensive longitudinal patient care (editorial) // Cleft Palate J. — 1985. — Vol. 22. — P. 235.
17. Volozhin A., Roguinski V. Agueeva L. et al. Using osteoiductive membranes for closing maxilla and hard palate defects in children // Journ. of Cran. Maxil. Surg. — 2000. — Vol. 28. — P. 3–12.
18. Marsh J.L., Grames L.M., Holtman B. Intravelar veloplasty: a prospective study // Cleft Palate J. — 1989. — Vol. 26. — P. 46–50.
19. McWilliams B.J., Morris H.L., Shelton R.L. Cleft palate speech. Ed. 2. — Philadelphia: «BC Decker», 1990. — P. 47.
20. Edward N.E., D'Antonio L.L., Hardesty R.A. Assessment of the patient with cleft lip and palate. A developmental approach. Advances in management of cleft lip and palate. November 11–14, 1995. — Monterey, California, 1995.
21. Тогунов И.А. Медицинская услуга и методология экспертизы (к вопросу формализации медицинской помощи) // Проблемы социальной гигиены и истории медицины. — 1996. — № 4. — С. 18–20.
Review
Views:
260
Email this article 